The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In this kind of circumstances, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority on the parent department with the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of your respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it really is actually pretty obscure about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the ninety-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be viewed as, however, we have been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy topic into the approval with the competent authority.

The stated recovery could possibly be used, for the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot certainly be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of event. The explained memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as very little was discovered on account of such pointation. The place of prevalence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already while in the knowledge of witnesses prior to their pointation from the get more info petitioners. Reliance can also be placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Permit’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more

Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.

When numerous websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s vital To judge the credibility from the source before relying on the information.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.

PACER allows anybody with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for just a PACER account.

However, it’s essential to note that the application on the death penalty is topic to several legal safeguards and due process to make sure fair trials.

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified scientists to review and rule on long term grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *